Angelo-li.blogspot.com Website Review

[Criminal law ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆] A man wants to steal a medieval car A sports car with a B brand, but there is no good opportunity. One evening, set fire to the locomotive parked in the apartment next door, and then left. After the firefighters saw the fire, the locomotive was completely destroyed. The stairwell of one of the apartments was burnt black. On the occasion of the disaster relief, Jiayi B entered the open space of the vehicle parking lot and drove the B sports car away. Question: What is the crime of A? [Criminal Law ★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆] A man wants to steal a B-clas* sports car of a medieval car, but there is no good opportunity. One evening, set fire to the locomotive parked in the apartment next door, and then left. After the firefighters saw the fire, the locomotive was completely destroyed. The stairwell of one of the apartments was burnt black. On the occasion of the disaster relief, Jiayi B entered the open space of the vehicle parking lot and drove the B sports car away. Question: What is the crime of A? 1. Objectively, there is a causal relationship and objective accountability between the behavior of firearms and the result of burning of the locomotive, and this behavior also has a public danger; subjectively, A has intentionality. 2. A crime is unblocked but it is illegal and prevents the cause of guilt. 1. Objectively, the establishment of this crime in the residential part must be committed to the home for the use of people and must be at the level of burning. In this question, the apartment is only blackened by the stairwell and It is not completely destroyed. Therefore, it is doubtful whether it is at the level of burning. The views of this theory are as follows: (1) Independent combustion: The extent to which the behavioral object can be burned independently of the combustion medium after the fire. (2) A destructive saying: the material or utility of the act object is a loser. (3) The important part of the damage theory (the loss of utility): The behavior object is burning on fire, to the main part of its object or its utility loser. (4) Public security threats: Another scholar believes that the above three statements are inconsistent with the nature of this crime as a public security crime. If the judgment is up to burn, it should return to the nature of this crime to protect public safety, depending on the behavior of the perpetrator. Whether the arson behavior has reached the level of jeopardizing public safety is not important as to whether the effectiveness is lost and whether important parts begin to burn.