Daesan.com Website Review

In spite of its complexity, it was said that effectiveness was low. So what are the alternatives? I think it is fascinating to say that I personally consider the automata theory itself. However, in the compiler implementation, I think that the The results of applying the automata theory have been> trivial to this day and are skeptical about the future possibilities of this approach. I would rather use the automata> theory to aid the development of the programming language. Then, Professor Pratt then goes on to explain a very simple and elegant algorithm to parse the expression recursively. Already in 1973. Why did not this paper get attention earlier? 1) As Professor Pratt said, people were too fascinated to apply automata theory to the problem of parsing, and 2) the explanation of the article was not simple and graceful (as is always the case with these kinds of articles). Fortunately, this article has not been forgotten forever, but it is gradually becoming known as the parser by the famous Douglas Crockford in the Ja*aScript community. In Part 3, I'll look at the code with the implementation of the Pratt parser. Lisp hacker friends in computer science at the department said, In Lisp. I can handle the code with data, he said with a profound expression. Languages ​​are becoming more and more evolving towards Lisp, and at the end of the day they support macros they are no longer able to call it a new language. At least Paul Graham said that Lisp is the ultimate