Englishuniprep.wordpress.com Website Review

just found i forgot to publish this post.  now using qda miner light to code up the interviews.  i hope the free version will be enough. choosing how to an*lyse the texts i have is a big question.   i need to create lexical strings – this is a given from my supervisor.  i so interesting looking back over this and seeing all my ideas being dashed.   i note especially the research group and the ethics process.  i am wondering right now whether my ethics papers are all floating out to sea.  what will that mean if it has happened?  is my first attempts were very complex as i tried to capture everything of importance in the student’s writing.  i am now going to the other extreme and making very simple ones: adding only those lexical items that seem to add to cohesion.  this includes inaccurate ones out when it is not just an excuse not to make lexical strings, which i think i can also do on this!! what does it mean to import an ontology, i have started this category to encourage myself to think about the bigger picture and how i can write this all up in some meaningful way.  of course my fear is that i will find that it is not very important for us to teach our students good english and any token does the teacher really value dense writing? – does anyone anymore – publish widely for a wide audience?  i believe we are seeing the popularisation of academic writing; we are unpacking the nominalisations for the modern (lazy) audience first attempt to do lexical strings in 3 egs of student writing. i am having trouble knowing how to categorise the type of connection.  one eg is when it is an adjective or a quality of the head word item.  this seems neither a sub clas* or part.  i am also not sure whether skype meeting 05.12.17- from tblisi summary action require update research questions i said how to actually do the data an*lysis was worrying me–i am trying to read but feel unfocused because sfl feels too vast so am wanting some direction so a fair bit of discussion was