Ethosdebate.com Website Review

master clas*ical rhetoric: the light-side discipline of wisdom that moves society toward the good. communication is a discipline, not just a skill. our training teaches students the discipline it takes to master communication. ethos practices mentorship, prayer, excellence, and diligence. join us in the timeless journey of rhetoric.   get better last time, we introduced spikes and preemption, and saw what they look like in the 1ac. today, we move to the 2ac, and next time we’ll talk about neg. 2ac spikes exist to mitigate the neg block by making the 1ar easier. this article does a wonderful job of outlining.. in mid-2017, i wrote an article describing what the stock issues are and why they are useful. i still recommend that article for a basic introduction into the stock issues, but since then, i have updated my views on the framework. this article presents a newer and.. calling all stoa tp debaters! if you are looking for a spring case idea, or want help researching opponents cases, join ethos debate fellow, gregory rehmke as he unpacks the stoa tp resolution, and how you need to attack it. what cases are good, which ones are great,.. have you ever listened to a presentation or speech, where the speaker is clearly not confident in themselves? it’s very awkward. listeners and audience members can sense confidence almost better than sharks can smell blood. confidence, or a lack thereof, bleeds out.. if you’ve ever played volleyball, you know the terror of a spike. a player slams the ball over the net so hard you have no hope of returning it. in debate, a spike is a little different, but still a powerful offensive tactic. referring broadly to preemption, a spike.. one of the most common questions we field is “why ethos?” feel free to take a look at our comprehensive model of education and debate here. but beyond that, the questioner usually is trying to ask one of two things: why should i get coaching period? why should i.. “i don’t understand. i had superior arguments, evidence, and refutation, but the judge voted for the other team.” i imagine every