Helmilaw.wordpress.com Website Review

HELMI LAW OFFICES AND PARTNERS. ALAMAT JL AMANGKURAT RT31 KEL. TANJUNG PINANG KEC. EAST JAMBI, JAMBI CITY, HP. 081366065099. I, as the Attorney acting for and on behalf of the interests of Defendant IV, in the Civil No case: 1. That in principle the Defendant IV denied all the arguments of the Exception stated by the Plaintiffs in their Replica, except those things which were expressly recognized in this Duplicate; 2. Whereas the description of points 2 a, bc and d in the Replic of the Plaintiffs is completely unfounded and legally grounded because clearly the object of the case sued by the Plaintiffs belongs to the heirs of the deceased H. Usman Hamid Cs who have had the power permanent law. It is clearly seen that the certificate of ownership number 309 of 1990 has proven that the late H. Usman Hamid Cs has mastered the object of the land, which at that time no one objected to the issuance of the certificate, so did the late H. Usman Hamid Cs conduct sale and purchase transactions with Defendant IV before the Jambi Sub-District Head outside the City as the Land Deed Maker Officer (PPAT). Which legal facts have proven that when the land was controlled by the late H. Usman Hamid Cs there was no physical land ownership by the Plaintiffs or the late Junaidi. For this reason, there is no legal basis for the Plaintiff's argument stating that there is no legal relationship to not include the heirs of H. Usman Hamid Cs and the Outer Jambi Sub-District Head as Acting Land Deed (PPAT) as parties to this case; 3. That what was stated in point 3 of the argument of the Plaintiffs of the Plaintiffs was basically clear that the disputed land object was unclear and clear where the exact position of the land was sued by the plaintiffs, because the plaintiff's argument only mentions Kampung Paal Merah and Desa Kebun IX in general, while the exact position of