Ideobook.com Website Review

Academic Works · Comments Essay · Reading Miscellaneous · Cultural Information Today, December 11, 2018, is the 100th anniversary of Solzhenitsyn's birth. According to Professor Gary Saul Morson, the 20th century Russian literature, known as the clas*ic, is probably only the Gulag Archipelago and the Master and Margaret. Solzhenitsyn English biographer Michael Scammell in the New York Times commemorative article: The Writer Who Destroyed an Empire. Reference: The Economist's Book of the Year: 2011; 2012; 2013; 2014; 2015; 2016; 2017. The big read: The Economist's books of the year Politics and current affairs Moneyland: The Inside Story of the Crooks and Kleptocrats Who Rule the World. By Oliver Bullough. Profile Books; 298 pages; £20. To be published in America by St Martin's $28.99 Moneyland is the author's term for the virtual country into which the world's mega-rich smuggle their (sometimes ill-gotten) wealth, so insulating it from the attention of tax and other officials. Focused in part on the kleptocrats of The former Soviet Union, the book ranges across the world and a wide cast of lawyers,... In the early 1990s, Yu Guangzhong had some troubles about Dai Wangshu’s poetry language. The general idea is that Dai Wangshu's poetry language has many flaws, far from maturity; and such a poet with a deadly language defect actually occupies a prominent position in the history of new poetry, which is very strange. Since poetry is a special language arena, later poets realized that the language limitations of the predecessors not only meant his own growth, but also an inevitable process of the development of poetry itself. However, in the blame of Dai Wangshu in Yu Guang, I was amazed that the latecomers lacked the necessary sympathy for the language resources and language environment in which the pioneers depended; not only that, Yu Guangzhong’s judgment on Dai Wangshu’s language ability Also very problematic. The biggest question is whether we use the scale itself to have sufficient objectivity when we use today's standards for poetry language to measure the poets of Dai Wangshu. The question is not whether Dai Wangshu’s language is ma*ure or perfect, because it is like a fun dispute. In the blame of Dai Wangshu in Yu Guang, what makes me feel unfair is that his criticism is more out of his own language taste; and he uses his taste as an objective aesthetic standard. In this way, he concluded that Dai Wangshu’s poetic language is imma*ure, and it is doubtful. Because in the history of new poetry, in terms of absolute language ability, only two or three poets can match him. Of course, due to the era in which Dai Wangshu is located, the overall level of the new poetry language is relatively low, which more or less affects his ability to fully display his talents. In his individual texts, his language does have many problems, but it must be realized that no matter how many of these problems, they are compared with Dai Wangshu’s consciousness of poetry language, compared with the language he possesses, even with him. Compared to some of the other excellent texts, they are very secondary. In my opinion, Dai Wangshu currently enjoys a prominent position in the history of new poetry, not for other reasons, for example, not because of his pioneering spirit in the theme, not because of his innovative sense of style, precisely because he is in poetry The language shows an unforgettable accomplishment. If people want to be in the history of the development of new poetry, for the progress of poetry language and several monuments of ma*ure trees, many famous people can be ignored, but this piece of Dai Wangshu must be tree.