Insights4print.ceo Website Review

in my previous article, i discussed the tolerances that the tools used in print quality control have. at least: in theory. to check this in practice, i launched a survey: ‘your color guide and you’. the goal was to get an idea of how people use color guides in daily… color is probably the main quality criterium when dealing with print. and lower deviations are better, leading to some people demanding, defending a delta e 2000 of 2 for brand colors. but this raises a few questions, among which what the reference is and how reliable that would you like to be part of an interesting, crowdsourced color research? then i have a few questions for you. i would like to get a better understanding of the use of pantone guides. with a dominant position, you can’t neglect these guides. but usage can differ: some the publication of the groundbreaking color study did generate some attention. especially my plea for a more realistic, less fanatic approach to color tolerances in real life seemed provocative to some. i e.g. got a mail from somebody who is quite familiar with milka,. groundbreaking color study: 2 out of 3 see differences between identical packages, de 6 won’t influence buying. you can find them in attics and basements: unknown treasures. at the campus of the ap university college in antwerp, there is such a treasure. a groundbreaking study on the perception of color deviations. the results are intriguing: almost 1 out of 3 right after i had published the article about real-life factors influencing color appearance in packaging, i opened my mailbox and found another very nice example. this one with a number of factors influencing color appearance in marketing. it is so nice that i have the previous article about color memory started some discussion on linkedin, with a number of people strongly defending very tight tolerances. packages should always look exactly the same, also with reorders, with e-commerce in mind. let’s put it to test and do a few