Insights on livewebmarks.com
Livewebmarks.com receives about 893924 visitors in one month.
That could possibly earn about $4469.62 each month or $148.99 each day.
Traffic and Value (estimated)
Website Value | $80454 |
Alexa Rank | 86822 |
Monthly Visits | 893924 |
Daily Visits | 29798 |
Monthly Earnings | $4469.62 |
Daily Earnings | $148.99 |
Server Connection Speed
It took our server 2.8 seconds to reach and load the main page of Livewebmarks.com. This does not include JavaScript, image and CSS files load timing. This is a good result.
This result is good enough, but there is a room for improvement. If you would like to investigate please refer to the link at the bottom of this page.
More Domains on 166.62.27.145 IP
All the websites that share your site's IP are considered to be safe in terms of content.
Show More
Website is marked as "not safe" if any part of its content has images or text that could be related to explicit "not family safe" material. Neighboring such websites could be a dangerous sign for any webmaster who cares about SEO traffic. Often "non family safe" websites use tedious link building methods. It is not a secret that Google may apply sanctions because of low quality mass link building and if a server is full of websites that are potentially could be banned then sanctions could be applied to the whole server. If livewebmarks.com is found on this server theoretically it may be banned as well as all other websites on this server's IP.
Livewebmarks.com Code Optimization Checklist
Summary Score is a calculated score for livewebmarks.com code structure and quality including the level of HTML code optimization, CSS and JavaScript compression.
Gzip compression is enabled
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/styles.css?1.5.4 -> 772B -> 14%
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/style.css?1.5.4 -> 355B -> 12%
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/layout.css?1.5.4 -> 309B -> 12%
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/print.css -> 109B -> 11%
HTML code is minified
- http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js?ver=1.4.4
- https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?hl=en-US&ver=4.9.9
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/styles.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/layout.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/style.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/custom/skin_basic_dark_orange.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/print.css
- /wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.9.9
- /wp-content/plugins/theme-my-login/theme-my-login.css?ver=6.4.10
- http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Cousine
- /logo.png -> expiration not set
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/print.css -> expiration not set
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/print.css -> expiration not set
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/images/bg_content.gif -> expiration not set
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/images/tinyicons.png -> expiration not set
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/images/vote-buttons-small.png -> expiration not set
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/images/vote-buttons.png -> expiration not set
- https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?hl=en-US&ver=4.9.9 -> 5 minutes
- https://syndication.twitter.com/settings -> 10 minutes
- http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js -> 30 minutes
- https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js -> 30 minutes
- https://apis.google.com/js/rpc:shindig_random.js?onload=init -> 30 minutes
- https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/current/osd.js?cb=%2Fr20100101 -> 50 minutes
- https://www.googletagservices.com/activeview/js/current/osd_listener.js?cache=r20110914 -> 50 minutes
- http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js -> 60 minutes
- http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js -> 2 hours
- https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js -> 2 hours
Speed and usability scores by Google PageSpeed Insights.
Show More
• Speed Score
This is a resulting grade of the analized livewebmarks.com web page structure. Analysis tries to identify slow elements on the page such as incompressed images and not minified JavaScript code.
• Usability Score
This number is generated on the basis of livewebmarks.com content analysis. Do all UI elements fit the mobile viewport? Are all links and buttons located not too close to each other? The algorithm tries to answer these questions and give an estimated score.
• For more explanation and detailed report please visit https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
Gzip is enabled
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/styles.css?1.5.4 -> 772B -> 14%
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/style.css?1.5.4 -> 355B -> 12%
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/layout.css?1.5.4 -> 309B -> 12%
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/print.css -> 109B -> 11%
HTML is minified
- /logo.png could be reduced in size by 3.5KiB (61%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.skyforweb.com.au%2Fwebsite-optimisation-seo-audit%2F?w=100 could be reduced in size by 2.4KiB (44%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fnorton-setup-norton.com%2Fmyaccount%2F?w=100 could be reduced in size by 2.1KiB (48%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.waterforlife.org.in%2Fhydrating%2F?w=100 could be reduced in size by 2.1KiB (46%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fgonorton-norton.com%2F?w=100 could be reduced in size by 2.1KiB (45%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.yoga-king.com%2Fmoon-stone-mala?w=100 could be reduced in size by 1.9KiB (45%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mcafeekeymcafee.com%2Fretailcard%2F?w=100 could be reduced in size by 1.9KiB (46%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.waterforlife.org.in%2Falkalizing%2F?w=100 could be reduced in size by 1.5KiB (47%)
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/images/vote-buttons.png could be reduced in size by 992B (19%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fwomens-socks-lingerie.weebly.com%2Fblog%2Ffive-best-and-trendy-tights-for-women?w=100 could be reduced in size by 925B (56%)
- https://s.wordpress.com/mshots/v1/https%3A%2F%2Fsetup-office-setup.com%2F?w=100 could be reduced in size by 811B (66%)
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/images/vote-buttons-small.png could be reduced in size by 394B (16%)
- https://static.xx.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v3/y5/r/OqOE21UvWe3.png could be reduced in size by 201B (50%)
- http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.4.4/jquery.min.js?ver=1.4.4
- https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?hl=en-US&ver=4.9.9
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/styles.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/layout.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/style.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/nominate/custom/skin_basic_dark_orange.css?1.5.4
- /wp-content/themes/elemental/lib/styles/print.css
- /wp-includes/css/dashicons.min.css?ver=4.9.9
- /wp-content/plugins/theme-my-login/theme-my-login.css?ver=6.4.10
- http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Cousine
Some elements on the page are too close to each other. This may cause confusion while browsing.
Some elements on the page are bigger than the size of mobile viewport
Livewebmarks.com Server Location
Country: United States
Metropolitan Area: Scottsdale
Postal Reference Code: 85260
Latitude: 33.6013
Longitude: -111.8867
Livewebmarks.com Main Page Content
HTML Tag | Content | Informative? |
Title: | LiveWebmarks.com : Best Social Bookmarking Service On The Web | User Driven Internet Marketing Bookmarklet Community | Easily Store, Organize, Import & Export Your Bookmarks | |
Description: | Not set | Empty |
H3: | Wedding Invitations | Is it informative enough? |
Do you own livewebmarks.com?
We've noticed that you have issues with some content elements on the main page:
• You should add a description to the main page of livewebmarks.com if you want your potential visitors to see it in Google or other search engines.
• Take a look at the headings; there might be too little information. Headings are important for usability and search engine optimization.
Cheapest available TLD alternatives
All the information about livewebmarks.com was collected from publicly available sources
В Челябинской области хранится более 360 тонн негодных...