Medicinacuantica.global Website Review

Okay. Sheldrake. I have been procasting this entry by not being able to avoid feeling some ambiguity about the content of the conference. I was inviting under the premise of offering a discourse on the ideas or thesis that somehow challenge current mainstream thinking, or the Although the entry represents a defense of your point of view, let's go ahead that we are not going anywhere by mutilating the bases that sustain current science. In many ways and using a cunning, very British sense of humor, Sheldrake basically ridicules as few the philosophy behind the prevailing laws and theories, and reaches the ha*dcore fabric of physics when he challenges such important and integral factors in the formulation as the constants. Maybe he is not right and if a more integrative and less polarized way of presenting his approach. Expecting the TED Scientific Council to pat him on the back is pretty naive. On the other hand, the emergence of quantum physics clashes with the wisdom imbued in materialistic physics since the addends or the integrating parts of everything that exists seem to act in a curiously anarchic way opening the debate to a cosmovision possibly much more futuristic than the current. (continue reading ...) Three scientists researching in American universities have been awarded the 2013 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for revolutionizing Chemistry with their computer models that replicate complex chemical processes and help understand and predict complexity under chemical processes. Thanks to the Austrian Martin Karplus, the British Michael Levitt and the Israeli Arieh Washelhan, behind were sticks or plastic ba*ls that were used to graph and understand the complicated chemical processes that occur in a fraction of a Chemical reactions occur at high speed and in many cases they are imperceptible to the human eye. The clas*ic Chemistry makes a