Myheritage.org Website Review

In a recent interview with Fox’s Harris Faulkner, President Trump cited Heritage Senior Legal Fellow Hans von Spakovsky’s work The piece addressed the popular liberal argument that claims President Trump conspired to violate campaign finance laws by giving money to The President’s former attorney, Michael Cohen, pled guilty to tax evasion and financial fraud charges, but von Spakovsky takes issue with the notion that there were violations to campaign finance law, which were part of Cohen’s plea agreement. As a former member of the Federal Election Commission, von Spakovsky notes that spending restrictions established by the Federal Election Campaign Act specifically do not apply to expenditures that would “exist irrespective of the candidate’s election campaign.” Von Spakovsky also recalled that the Justice Department’s prosecution of similar charges against former Senator John Edwards resulted in acquittal. The claim that the President violated campaign laws doesn’t withstand scrutiny. When you have the best legal minds an*lyzing the issues of our day, it’s possible to dismantle an attempt to use election laws as a weapon against the president. Thank you for giving us the resources to defend the truth and lay out the facts for all—even the President of. WHAT SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT THE CRIMINALIZATION OF POLITICS, AND THE ENDLESS INVESTIGATIONS AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICIALS? The United States could have ceded its immigration lawmaking power to the United Nations. But it didn’t, because as Ambas*ador Nikki Haley said last year, “immigration policies must always be made by Americans and Americans alone.” Under the Obama administration, the The U.S. will not sign the migration compact, and that’s a good thing, according to Senior Legal Fellow Hans von Spakovsky and Senior Research Fellow Brett Schaefer. The pact was de*ply flawed, blurring the line between legal and illegal immigration and making detention of illegal immigrants “a measure of last resort.” Had the U.S. signed onto those agreements, U.S. immigration laws would have been overruled