Noharmm.org Website Review

It is the privilege, the curse, and ultimately the responsibility of human rights advocates For over 100 years, English-speaking societies, most notably the United States, have debated the pros and cons of circu*cising healthy male children. In a new era of childrens rights, greater respect for their rights must be accorded. Circu*cision of healthy infants and children is not in their best interests. Optimized for Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer versions 3.0 and higher > When imposed on gi*ls, these customs tend to be as severe, or more > so, than those imposed on boys. Boys, however, are six times MORE > likely to be subjected to these genital violations than gi*ls. To > express concern for individual rights to one's own body, NOHARMM > created The Genital Integrity Ribbon in 1998 from a concept > developed in 1996 by the late human rights activist John A. > two sides of the same ribbon. Male and female circu*cision are also > different, but they share many important similarities and are two > The Genital Integrity Ribbon is a compas*ionate expression of > solidarity among children's rights advocates, as well as a sign of > THE BLUE AND PINK RIBBON WEB IMAGE MAY ONLY BE USED IN CONJUNCTION > WITH THE TEXT: GENITAL INTEGRITY.    ? 1998 NOHARMM > If you dont understand why circu*cision is not in the best interests > of children, > please visit these sites for more information. >