Papacapim.org Website Review

I need to start by saying that I received several messages from people who read the previous posts and, when they started to understand the MST's performance, they began to see the Movement with different eyes. I can not tell you how much that counts to me. It is these messages that make me believe that it is possible to break prejudices and that my work, although at the moment being a sofa militancy, is capable of producing a positive change in society. Keep fighting with your fist erect. The third post in the series is probably the most anticipated. Do you know those myths you grew up listening to? Those comments made by your uncle or father (or teacher, or newscaster) that made you always see the MST with bad eyes? I came here to demystify all this and also to answer the questions that ask me more often. Difficult not to have an extremely hostile attitude towards the MST when the president-elect of our country vomits prejudice and encourages violence in the national network, right? But let's go. The MST does not invade lands, the appropriate term is OCCUPY. The right to private property is guaranteed by our Constitution, but this Constitution also says that all land must fulfill the social function, that is, it must be producing within its capacity, respecting the environment and without work an*logous to sl*very. Otherwise it may be expropriated by INCRA and used for agrarian reform. Landless workers OCCUPATE only large unproductive properties that do not fulfill the social function. But if you agree that trespas*ing is a terrible crime that would justify a response as violent as that suggested by the president-elect, then let's talk of trespas*ing. Do you know who actually invades land? The large landowners who practice grilagem. Grilagem is when a private owner invades third party lands, usually public lands, creating false docu*ents for