Riofriospacetime.blogspot.com Website Review

it is only apparent to those most educated. It would cause expansion of the Universe to accelerate, in violation of the First Law of Thermodynamics on the grandest scale. Alleged detection of dark energy led to a Nobel Prize in 2011. Not happy with their million, the discoverers proposed billion-dollar space experiments to investigate dark energy, with names like SNAP. The last remnant of them, WFIRST, is cancelled in the new NASA budget. February 21-23, 2018 is a Dark Matter conference at UCLA. The conference used to include dark energy, but the latter is a dead field. Reputable conferences like the International Astronomical Union don't include dark energy, though they have discussions on a changing speed of light. The accelerating data is sign of a change in the speed of light, exactly as predicted. A simple equation GM=tc^3 predicts the accelerating data more precisely than any dark speculation. The idea of repulsive dark for the discovery. Shortly after Oxford researchers published a paper saying the dark energy may not exist, Riess was compelled to write a denial in Scientific American blogs. No, astronomers haven't decided dark energy is nonexistent! Professor Subir Sarkar of Oxford has long been a skeptic of dark energy. The idea of an accelerating universe was first proposed in 1998 by two competing groups of physicists, both based in Berkeley and both using the same data on Type Ia supernovae. In a new study of 740 supernovae, 10 times the original dataset, Professor Sarkar concludes that the data is consistent with a non-accelerating universe. Marginal spent careers and their credibility professing that the universe is filled with a repulsive dark energy. If DE really dominated the universe, objects would not fall toward Earth! Data indicating an accelerating universe really shows a slowing speed of light. A Science has long tried to put the Universe on a T-shirt. Using science and light, I've done that. The project has only been on Kickstarter a