Shanlaxjournals.in Website Review

and veteran Research Scholars who are keen on highlighting the salient features of the latest developments in all our Journals. The Shanlax International Journals are meant for promoting by an interest of the blooming and prospective writers. The Panel of Shanlax International Journals is constituted by pre-eminent scholars who have left their footprint in all prominence. The articles published in the Shanlax International Journals are intended to give an exposure to the Research Scholars pursuing their investigations at Ph.D. level.. AS PER UGC’S NORMS SHANLAX INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS INCLUDE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS FROM UGC REGULATIONS, 2018 DT. 31ST JULY IN OUR JOURNAL’S. Shanlax International Journals like to inform all our academicians to aware, now University Grants Commission (Promotion of Academic Integrity and Prevention of Plagiarism in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations, 2018 is applicable to the students, faculty, researchers and staff of all Higher Educational Institutions in the country. The Peer-review process is an essential part of the publication process; it definitely improves the quality of the article to be published. Peer review ensures an independent as*essment and accuracy of the results described. With the collaboration of editors and reviewers, Shanlax International Journals can ensure that the man*scripts we publish are among the most important in their respective disciplines. Shanlax Journals administer an effective review system. Our Peer review is designed to choose technically valid research of significant interest. Our Referees are expected to find the flaws and request to suggest advice to improve the quality of the article to be published. Our peer reviewer can only evaluate what the authors chose to include in the man*script. By this publication approach, our peer review process will identify fraudulent data before publication. All contributions submitted to Shanlax journals that are selected for peer review are sent to at least one, but usually two independent reviewers, selected by the editors. The editor’s