Insights on videocopilot.net
Videocopilot.net receives about 720269 visitors in one month.
That could possibly earn about $3601.35 each month or $120.04 each day.
Traffic and Value (estimated)
Website Value | $64825 |
Alexa Rank | 14526 |
Monthly Visits | 720269 |
Daily Visits | 24009 |
Monthly Earnings | $3601.35 |
Daily Earnings | $120.04 |
Traffic by Months (estimated)
Server Connection Speed
It took our server 3.15 seconds to reach and load the main page of Videocopilot.net. This does not include JavaScript, image and CSS files load timing. This is a good result.
This result is good enough, but there is a room for improvement. If you would like to investigate please refer to the link at the bottom of this page.
More Domains on 52.9.112.83 IP
Our system did not detect any websites except videocopilot.net on this IP.
Videocopilot.net Code Optimization Checklist
Summary Score is a calculated score for videocopilot.net code structure and quality including the level of HTML code optimization, CSS and JavaScript compression.
Gzip compression is enabled
- /assets/public/css/style.v7.css?v=7.63 -> 1.6KiB -> 11%
- /assets/public/js/owl-carousel/owl.theme.css -> 191B -> 31%
- /assets/public/js/owl-carousel/owl.carousel.css -> 114B -> 22%
HTML code is minified
- /assets/public/js/jquery/1.7.1/jquery.min.js
- /assets/public/js/spin.min.js
- /assets/public/js/jquery.spin.js
- /assets/public/prettyPhoto/css/prettyPhoto.3.1.5.min.css
- /assets/public/css/style.v7.css?v=7.63
- https://img.youtube.com/vi/1qwpeBiIdX0/0.jpg -> 2 hours
- https://ssl.google-analytics.com/ga.js -> 2 hours
Speed and usability scores by Google PageSpeed Insights.
Show More
• Speed Score
This is a resulting grade of the analized videocopilot.net web page structure. Analysis tries to identify slow elements on the page such as incompressed images and not minified JavaScript code.
• Usability Score
This number is generated on the basis of videocopilot.net content analysis. Do all UI elements fit the mobile viewport? Are all links and buttons located not too close to each other? The algorithm tries to answer these questions and give an estimated score.
• For more explanation and detailed report please visit https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
Gzip is enabled
- /assets/public/css/style.v7.css?v=7.63 -> 1.6KiB -> 11%
- /assets/public/js/owl-carousel/owl.theme.css -> 191B -> 31%
- /assets/public/js/owl-carousel/owl.carousel.css -> 114B -> 22%
HTML is minified
- /blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/decay_SS-V2.jpg could be reduced in size by 1.6MiB (82%)
- /blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/youtube-orb-thumbnail.jpg could be reduced in size by 1.1MiB (82%)
- /blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/cinematic_Fade.jpg could be reduced in size by 721.4KiB (75%)
- /blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Tutorial_Thumbnail_V003-higher-logo-1.jpg could be reduced in size by 243.4KiB (49%)
- /blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Tutorial_Thumbnail_V003-higher-logo.jpg could be reduced in size by 241.5KiB (49%)
- /assets/public/images/vc_cool/tutorialpics/large/167.jpg could be reduced in size by 206.7KiB (72%)
- /assets/public/images/vc_cool/tutorialpics/large/168.jpg could be reduced in size by 62KiB (51%)
- /blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/8974C093-9B91-43AD-8DBC-048527E805B6.jpeg could be reduced in size by 52.3KiB (27%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/products/59/banners/426x479.jpg could be reduced in size by 36KiB (39%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/products/37/banners/302x172.jpg could be reduced in size by 30.7KiB (65%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/products/45/banners/320x360.jpg could be reduced in size by 29.2KiB (49%)
- /blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Lon_d.jpg could be reduced in size by 26.7KiB (17%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/products/45/banners/302x172.jpg could be reduced in size by 22.2KiB (47%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/products/75/banners/302x172.jpg could be reduced in size by 19.5KiB (49%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/products/82/banners/302x172.jpg could be reduced in size by 14.7KiB (48%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/header-logo.jpg could be reduced in size by 6.5KiB (37%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/side-nav-bg.jpg could be reduced in size by 1.1KiB (36%)
- /assets/public/images/v6/template/connect/instagram.png could be reduced in size by 1,001B (52%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/footer/instagram.png could be reduced in size by 952B (54%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/navigation/products_over.png could be reduced in size by 940B (37%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/navigation/blog_over.png could be reduced in size by 904B (49%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/navigation/retina/blog.png could be reduced in size by 825B (47%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/footer/logo.jpg could be reduced in size by 789B (24%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/navigation/retina/products.png could be reduced in size by 777B (33%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/navigation/retina/connect1.png could be reduced in size by 617B (33%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/navigation/retina/tutorials.png could be reduced in size by 604B (28%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/nav-highlight.png could be reduced in size by 504B (39%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/footer/youtube.png could be reduced in size by 409B (35%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/footer/twitter.png could be reduced in size by 325B (33%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/footer/facebook.png could be reduced in size by 307B (38%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/icons/3d.png could be reduced in size by 155B (33%)
- /assets/public/images/v7/template/account-bg.jpg could be reduced in size by 141B (16%)
- /assets/public/images/v6/template/connect/twitter_new.png could be reduced in size by 108B (24%)
- /assets/public/js/jquery/1.7.1/jquery.min.js
- /assets/public/js/spin.min.js
- /assets/public/js/jquery.spin.js
- /assets/public/prettyPhoto/css/prettyPhoto.3.1.5.min.css
- /assets/public/css/style.v7.css?v=7.63
Some elements on the page are too close to each other. This may cause confusion while browsing.
Some elements on the page are bigger than the size of mobile viewport
Videocopilot.net Server Location
Country: United States
Metropolitan Area: San Jose
Postal Reference Code: 95141
Latitude: 37.3388
Longitude: -121.8914
Videocopilot.net Main Page Content
HTML Tag | Content | Informative? |
Title: | VIDEO COPILOT | After Effects Tutorials, Plug-ins and Stock Footage for Post Production Professionals | |
Description: | High quality After Effects Video Tutorials for motion graphics and visual effects presented by Andrew Kramer | |
Do you own videocopilot.net?
We've noticed that you have issues with some content elements on the main page:
• Description tag could contain more content. We detected that this tag contains 108 characters and this is a small volume for a description.
Cheapest available TLD alternatives
All the information about videocopilot.net was collected from publicly available sources
В Челябинской области хранится более 360 тонн негодных...