Washingtonbarbosa.com Website Review

The text will address the an*lysis of the distinctions between sureties and guarantees, so that it understands the importance of the legislative changes arising in the Civil Code of 2002, which decided to require uxória grant the first, when the 1916 stuff diploma reserved for decades Brazilian law did not require approval for the formation of any other formality than the mere guarantor of the declaration of intent, reserving the obligation to uxória or marital granted only in cases of bail. Article 1647, III of the Civil Code of 2002, however, brought innovation by extending the need to also grant the endorsement. Such a change has had a great impact on commercial relations and on the very institution of the endorsement, which is precisely designed to increase efficiency and dynamism in commercial transactions, without forgetting the significant reduction in the costs of financial operations. This study therefore aims to present, at first, one panomara on the main features of the endorsement institute and its distinctions regarding bail, and the impact of both the trade and the doctrinal understandings and jurisprudential urged with the innovation brought by Article 1647, III of the Civil Code of 2002. Drawing the parallel between the institutes, the arguments presented by the Rapporteur of the Special Appeal 1.633.399, Em. Minister Luís Felipe Salomão, of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), as well as the trial of a case in which there was an endorsement against the absence of the other marital required by civil legislation. The goal is to understand, given the differences between bail and surety, because the obligation to grant uxória can be qualified in one and not the other, as has defended the Minister of the Superior Court in that judgment .. I - REQUIREMENT OF Relativization CONJUGAL AWARD FOR THE VALIDATION OF THE AVAL. Securities can be backed by real and personal guarantees. Specifically among the personal guarantees, there is the